|
StatusThe thesis was presented on the 22 June, 2007Approved by NCAA on the 20 September, 2007 Abstract![]() ThesisCZU 341.231.14(043.2)
|
The basic purpose of the research carried out in the framework of the present paper is a penetrating analysis of the institution of protection of the rights of the child, on the background of the international regulations as well as conception, hypotheses, experts’ doctrinal statements about the causes and appearance of the phenomenon, the legal nature, domain of practical manifestation, legal and other phenomena which influence this institution.
The international regulation of the rights of the child is the crowning of efforts made with a view to acknowledging the child as a human, as a person with full rights. This moment has opened a new page in the history of human rights: the realization of all acknowledged rights of the child, unification of efforts for offering the child a better life.
The treatment of this highly important issue began with the examination of aspects that, at first sight, seemed to be commonly known, but which, de facto, due to their nature, proved to be little studied. The present paper constitutes partly a completion for these gaps, in order to clarify a series of controversies connected with the legal status of the child. Our contribution in these terms is a new way of treating the given matter, which encompasses arguments for the necessity of instituting certain mechanisms of protection of the child and the rights of the child, starting from the generally known international standards.
The complexity of the investigated phenomenon, conditioned especially by the precarious nature of childhood, determined the realization of its specific multilateral, interdisciplinary scientific analysis both from the theoretical ad practical point of view.
The entire spectrum of the investigations carried out in the present paper is founded on the following basic idea: there is a diversity of childhoods in the world, which imposes the regulation, analysis, and loyalty to the rights of the child and not the rights of children.
Under consideration [1] :
Theses Archive: