Attestation committee
Accreditation committee
Expert committee
Dispositions, instructions
Normative acts
MANPOWER TRAINING
Nomenclature
Institutions
Scientific councils
Seminars
Theses		 Scientific advisers
Scientists
Doctoral students
Postdoctoral students
CNAA logo

 română | русский | english

CNAA / Theses / 2007 / June /

Sentence in Criminal Procedure of the Republic of Moldova


Author: Artur Airapetean
Degree:doctor of law
Speciality: 12.00.08 - Criminal Law (with specification: Criminal Law, Criminology, Criminal Procedure Law, Criminalistics, Judicial Expertise, Executional Law; Theory of The Operative - Investigation Activity)
Year:2007
Scientific adviser: Iurie Sedleţchi
doctor, professor, Moldova State University
Institution:
Scientific council:

Status

The thesis was presented on the 2 June, 2007
Approved by NCAA on the 20 September, 2007

Abstract

Adobe PDF document – 0.30 Mb / in romanian
Adobe PDF document – 0.32 Mb / in russian

Keywords

judicial Sentence, judicial Verdict, condemnation Sentence with indication of penalty, condemnation Sentence with indication of penalty and liberation of its execution, condemnation Sentence without indication of penalty and liberation of its execution, acquit Sentence, sentence of cessation the criminal procedure, sentence with application of medical constraint measures, sentence for dismissal of procedure of medical constraint measures, sentence in the case of agreement of recognition of the guiltiness, sentence of rejecting revision request

Summary

The purpose of the doctoral scientific research consists in examination of theoretical background and practical problems of deliberation of judicial sentence in criminal procedure.

Nowadays, the problem of judicial sentence is not studied enough: without separating its specific properties, or it is examined only by its specific parts of the sentence (for example, penalty), without considering the exposed elimination of law violation, reparation of material damages, application of measures of preventing crimes.

The thesis elucidate essential disagreements, mentioned in currently in force law of criminal procedure, objections, inexactness, it also proposes some possible corrections. We hope that this thesis would interest the reader not only by its theme, that is referring to essential theoretical and practical problems of criminal procedure, but also by its specific extraordinary target setting, non-traditional conceptions, rich in normative and theoretical facts.

The purpose of this thesis according to the social development requirements is to offer some solutions, based on the fulfilled analysis of essential theoretical and practical problems of deliberation of sentence, which should protect persons, society and the state.

This work doesn’t pretend to highlight an in-depth analysis of the attached problems. It gives a detailed analysis, mainly to those problems that are less studied by legal literature, but at the same time, it represents a considerable theoretical and practical interest.

The present doctoral thesis considers the currently in force legislation till 1st March 2007.