StatusThe thesis was presented on the 8 December, 2006
Approved by NCAA on the 1 March, 2007
Abstract– 0.36 Mb / in romanian
1.07 Mb /
In this research is treating the forming of professional language at the futures physical education and sport teachers who became the conclusive factor for develops the standard teacher’s communication with the students.
On the base of the theoretical problem, at analytic pedagogical plans, at socio-pedagogical boring and at empirical investigation was induced the content on the physical education and sport teacher’s language and the semantic-functional structure of pedagogical communication in the physical education lessons with the gymnastics’ thematic as well as the content of the curriculum to form the necessary competences at the students from physical education and sport faculty.
It was elaborated also the methodology in the instructive process at “Gymnastic” and “Pedagogical practice”, which is orientated to the development of the theoretical knowledge and professional students competence which aim at the theoretical, methodically- practice and natural- practice to form theme.
The result of the lab formative pedagogical tests (in audience) in natural conditions at pedagogic practice gave us the possibility to underline the efficient of the present curriculum and methodology from the special lecture “The forming of the language at the students from Psychical Education and Sport Faculty”(80 hours) with the III year students (5-6 semester).
The parameters who confirm the level of professional language (forms of spelling, semantically cods, and communication functions- total 18 parameters) where the students from the experimental and control groups were register at the gymnastically lessons with the gymnasium students evidential of ascendancy to all parameters at the experimental group, event who confirm the efficacy of the submit curriculum.
The tools of the investigation can be implemented in the instructive process at the Psychical Education and Sport Faculties, at Perfecting Faculty but also to other Pedagogical Education Institute.
Under consideration  :